Beth Skwarecki
Deal pricing and availability subject to change after time of publication.

Beth Skwarecki
Senior Health Editor
Covering health, fitness tech, home gym equipment, and more.
Read Full Bio
Our Top 7 Picks
-
Best for running and fitnessGarmin Forerunner 970
$749.99
at Amazon
$749.99
at Amazon
-
Best smartwatch for iPhone usersApple Watch Series 11
$349.00
at Amazon
$349.00
at Amazon
-
Best smartwatch for Android usersPixel Watch 3
$249.99
at Amazon
$249.99
at Amazon
-
Best FitbitFitbit Charge 6
$99.95
at Walmart
$99.95
at Walmart
-
Best for casual fitness trackingGarmin Vivoactive 6
-
Best tracker that’s not a watchWhoop 5.0
$199.00
at Amazon
$199.00
at Amazon
-
Best budget running watchCoros Pace 3
$199.00
at Amazon
$199.00
at Amazon
Tracking your sleep, your workouts, and your daily steps can encourage you to take better care of your health, or help you with your athletic goals. (While you can run without a watch tracking your distance, not many hardcore runners would like to.)
But which tracker should you choose? I’m pleased to present my picks for the best fitness trackers for runners, for minimalists, for people who don’t want to charge a watch every day, and for iPhone and Android users who just want a nice smartwatch with fitness features.
Table of Contents
-
Best for running and fitnessGarmin Forerunner 970
-
The Good
-
Excellent location tracking -
Running analytics (both on-wrist and in the app) -
Built-in coaching and daily suggested workouts -
LED flashlight
The Bad-
No tight integration with your phone (for example, it can’t control music that is playing on your phone) -
No extensive app library
-
Get It Now -
-
Best smartwatch for iPhone usersApple Watch Series 11
-
The Good
-
Works smoothly with Apple devices -
Thin body -
Bright screen -
Extensive health analytics
The Bad-
Still a smartwatch more than a fitness watch (runners will prefer something with physical buttons) -
May not be a significant upgrade if you already own an earlier Apple Watch
-
Get It Now -
-
Best smartwatch for Android usersPixel Watch 3
-
The Good
-
36-hour battery life -
Bright display -
Two options for screen size (41 mm and 45 mm) -
Fitness metrics, including recovery and running dynamics
The Bad-
Always-on display has a delay in brightening up when you look at it -
Lack of physical buttons, and some inaccuracy in location, mean it won’t replace a serious running watch
-
Get It Now -
-
Best FitbitFitbit Charge 6
-
The Good
-
More affordable than most smartwatches -
Supports Google maps, Google wallet, YouTube music -
Seven-day battery life
The Bad-
Requires premium subscription for some features -
Music requires YouTube Music -
Google apps require your phone to be nearby
-
Get It Now -
-
Best for casual fitness trackingGarmin Vivoactive 6
-
The Good
-
Up to 11 day battery life -
Heart rate, body battery, and other health metrics -
Good GPS/location tracking -
Can receive phone notifications
The Bad-
Can’t make calls or send texts -
Only available in one size (42 mm) -
Doesn’t have as many performance metrics as Forerunner or Venu watches
-
-
-
Best tracker that’s not a watchWhoop 5.0
-
The Good
-
Can be worn on your arm, under clothes (or as a wristband) -
Sleep and recovery focus -
Finds patterns in your habits, the better to improve your sleep and recovery -
Has a strength training mode that accounts for the stress of strength training rather than tracking it like cardio -
No screen
The Bad-
No built-in GPS -
Requires a subscription ($239/year for the Peak level) -
No screen
-
Get It NowRead Full ReviewWhoop 5.0
-
-
Best budget running watchCoros Pace 3
-
The Good
-
Physical buttons -
Advanced running-specific features -
Highly accurate GPS and heart rate
The Bad-
MIP screen (though some would say that’s an advantage) -
Small size (42 mm)
-
Get It NowRead Full ReviewCoros Pace 3
-
Is there a better health tracker than Fitbit?
I would say so, yes! Which one depends on what you’re looking for. The Vivoactive 6 (or, to save a few bucks, the Vivoactive 5) would be my pick for something simple and fitness-focused. It can’t beat the Fitbit Charge 6 on price, but it offers better accuracy and a ton of useful fitness features.
What is the best fitness watch that doesn’t require a subscription?
Good news—none of the watches on this list require a subscription. (The Whoop does, but it’s not really a watch.) Garmin, Fitbit, and Apple watches don’t require a subscription for their main features. Garmin and Fitbit both offer premium subscriptions, but they’re for extras, not for the functionality of the watch. Apple watches don’t require a subscription either, but some fitness apps made for the Apple Watch may charge their own subscription fees.
Which is better, a smartwatch or a fitness tracker?
That’s a matter of preference, of course. I prefer fitness watches like the Garmin 970 or the Coros Pace 3 on this list. They give you helpful data during exercise without making you use your phone, and they can track your HRV and other metrics during sleep.
A device that is only a fitness tracker, like a Whoop or an Oura ring, will likely leave you wishing you had a watch instead (or in addition). That said, I have a list of my favorite fitness trackers here. You may also like to see how an Apple Watch stacked up to a Fitbit in my testing.
What do you think so far?